From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3f73d873d16dcda7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!130.59.10.21.MISMATCH!kanaga.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!cernne03.cern.ch!not-for-mail From: Maciej Sobczak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Return statements and their scope - guideline Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:37:49 +0100 Organization: CERN News Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: abpc10883.cern.ch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: cernne03.cern.ch 1171525069 14983 137.138.37.241 (15 Feb 2007 07:37:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@@cern.ch NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:37:49 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061220) In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9337 Date: 2007-02-15T08:37:49+01:00 List-Id: Jeffrey R. Carter wrote: > However, I've always felt > > if Some_Condition then > return 0; > end if; > > is easier to read Especially taking into account that it's not structurally different from "exit when" in loops, which is allowed. -- Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/ Programming : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/