From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f822ae7b0f7433c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: Cesar Rabak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Translating an embedded C algorithm Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:07:00 -0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <1168871816.263502.212100@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> <6Pdrh.353753$1i1.119670@attbi_s72> NNTP-Posting-Host: zEJK12x7djBBvRARhduGQA.user.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061109) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8212 Date: 2007-01-16T23:07:00-02:00 List-Id: Jeffrey Carter escreveu: > Cesar Rabak wrote: >> >> Yes. When building embedded systems, is it very rare that >> 'portability' be on the top of any requirements list. > > Many of the Ada RT embedded systems I've worked on have been ported to > new hardware or compilers, fairly easily, since I tend to avoid (RT)OS > and compiler dependencies, and to encapsulate and hide them when > unavoidable. I see, you probably have more latitude or freedom than other engineers that have to work with specific RT OS and components (sometimes even written in other languages than Ada). > >> Two mistakes don't make a good result! > > I see. Pointing out a mistake is a mistake. I didn't realize that. NO! Being rude and agressive is *the* mistake and now belittling is a continuation of it...