From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5cb36983754f64da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-10 21:08:44 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.moat.net!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:08:42 -0500
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:08:42 -0500
From: Wes Groleau <groleau+news@freeshell.org>
Reply-To: groleau+news@freeshell.org
Organization: Ain't no organization here!
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Macintosh/20040208)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Call for Ada
References: <20040206174017.7E84F4C4114@lovelace.ada-france.org>
 <mailman.3.1076142690.295.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <m3isij11u4.fsf_-_@insalien.org>
 <54759e7e.0402071124.322ea376@posting.google.com>
 <m3smhmz2fo.fsf@insalien.org> <rxmbc.53$bh.32@lakeread02>
 <406EB6D2.8030801@noplace.com>
 <Xns94C049091E42Bjimmaureenrogers@204.127.36.1> <87d66pyw1g.fsf@insalien.org>
 <406EEC35.7040109@noplace.com> <874qs0zvy1.fsf@insalien.org>
 <40714C98.90601@noplace.com> <1073gv22t969q5a@corp.supernews.com>
 <40729B9D.30906@noplace.com> <1076000ef5oj06f@corp.supernews.com>
 <pan.2004.04.07.00.16.39.788210@email.ro> <uvfkbn0t9.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <0emdncWNfbOyUendRVn-gg@gbronline.com> <c56tgi$1lpm$1@f04n12.cac.psu.edu>
 <CfadnRldxOIv1-XdRVn-uw@gbronline.com>
 <xN0ec.4324$k05.888@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <xN0ec.4324$k05.888@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <eo6dnUvUUtlWWeXdRVn-tw@gbronline.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.9.86.116
X-Trace: 
 sv3-yKbLQTNFZ5WjS4uAC6UyPPl42iN/eAFQk4Z5hp76laV7Ed//qon0LVnZNjj1pkO3Nthlzp9CjPgRAzn!t3lUY+rH8/aaHY9nK8tF3iuOIfcEO9RRHgPwJBkI+nTHniBryZNcOOkbR8aoydkvfE46a8dR12uk!eg==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6967
Date: 2004-04-10T23:08:42-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> I haven't seen any data to support it, but I suspect that C introduces 
> more new errors for every error fixed than Ada, giving Ada an even 
> greater edge, for the same reasons that C creates more errors in the 1st 
> place.

Yes, I thought of that, too but my argument was
already too complicated.  However, your math has
weakened my argument.  Maybe Ada _can_ break into
the open-source "market."

:-)

-- 
Wes Groleau
   "Ideas are more powerful than guns,
    We would not let our enemies have guns;
    why should we let them have ideas?"
                                -- Jozef Stalin