From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 10db24,fec75f150a0d78f5
X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: emery@grebyn.com (David Emery)
Subject: Re: POSIX/Unix conformance (was: ANSI C and POSIX ...)
Date: 1996/04/13
Message-ID: <emery-1304961942400001@line082.nwm.mindlink.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 147379333
references: <JSA.96Feb16135027@organon.com> <dewar.828987795@schonberg>
 <4kcf2q$mll@solutions.solon.com>
 <emery-0804961940190001@line297.nwm.mindlink.net>
 <4kkco2$i8m@nntp.Stanford.EDU>
organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu
Date: 1996-04-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <4kkco2$i8m@nntp.Stanford.EDU>, karish@pangea.Stanford.EDU
(Chuck Karish) wrote:

...

Thanks to Chuck for correcting my understanding of POSIX validation.  I
guess this has changed since my active involvement in POSIX a couple of
years ago.  Certainly having a publically available test suite is 
a good thing, IMHO.

            dave