From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 10db24,fec75f150a0d78f5
X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public
From: emery@grebyn.com (David Emery)
Subject: Re: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada)
Date: 1996/04/13
Message-ID: <emery-1304961940160001@line082.nwm.mindlink.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 147379245
references: <JSA.96Feb16135027@organon.com> <dewar.828757752@schonberg>
 <4kkbk7$hv8@nntp.Stanford.EDU> <dewar.829345812@schonberg>
 <4knq1l$g6d@nntp.Stanford.EDU>
organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu
Date: 1996-04-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <4knq1l$g6d@nntp.Stanford.EDU>, karish@pangea.Stanford.EDU
(Chuck Karish) wrote:

...
> I said that several implementations claim to support POSIX.1c.  There
> is no mechanism now in place for them to demonstrate conformance.
> 
> The examples I had in mind (there may well be others) are Solaris 2.5
> and Digital UNIX 1.0 (aka OSF/1 4.0).
> 
...
> 
>     Chuck Karish          karish@mindcraft.com
>     (415) 323-9000 x117   karish@pangea.stanford.edu

Does Digitial Unix 1.0 OSF/1 4.0 support BOTH POSIX threads (1003.1c) and
DCE threads (nee P1003.4b D4)?  There are some significant differences between
DCE threads and the final POSIX standard...

            dave