From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: hreba <f_hreba@yahoo.com.br>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Interfaces.C + generics: stack overflow
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:20:49 +0100
Message-ID: <ejkh90FlcecU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ejhckeF1tg7U1@mid.individual.net> <ob11eh$je5$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net b5S3NG09HtOzU3fbTxDCsQ3hB07sxPuG+aEgAd918XPXqwcB2s
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ep/PC/qSSeV32aRfZRBA8zHI6SM=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.5.1
In-Reply-To: <ob11eh$je5$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:46446
Date: 2017-03-24T13:20:49+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 03/23/2017 06:45 PM, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
> On 03/23/2017 08:43 AM, hreba wrote:
>>
>> Now when pass the type real as a generic parameter:
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> generic
>>    type Real is digits <>;
>> package GSL is
>> ...
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> and instanciate GSL with exactly the same type as above, I get a
>> STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access.
>
> Where do you instantiate the package? Where do you declare the function
> you pass to Integration_QNG?
>
>>    function gsl_integration_qng
>>      (f: access GSL_Function;
>
> This should not need to be an access parameter. It should be passed by
> reference as an "in" parameter. You can make it "in out" if you want.
>

Did as you suggested. Clearly better. Unfortunately the stack overflow 
persists. For the complete code please see my answer to Randy.

-- 
Frank Hrebabetzky		+49 / 6355 / 989 5070