From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b8a1363302988cfe
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: sjw <simon.j.wright@mac.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2009 for Mac OS X (Snow Leopard)
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <eeaf5cb6-a582-4c90-a494-bd17142600a8@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <af608388-8088-4779-a3ca-39275fd2c6cc@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
	<C75686D3.12F4F0%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <5b0bf629-0935-414d-9a57-1757632840b8@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
	<C756B67A.12F52F%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <a7b97585-f616-43e9-ac61-c468c88362fa@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
	<96854a61-2032-49b1-a8b2-8a5aee181701@22g2000yqr.googlegroups.com>
	<C7573F0A.12F81C%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <68e6e09a-9f02-4fd4-a87c-d1c43dd104e1@27g2000yqr.googlegroups.com>
	<C7580162.12F90C%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.30.110.254
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1261611869 6720 127.0.0.1 (23 Dec 2009 23:44:29
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:44:29 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.30.110.254;
	posting-account=_RXWmAoAAADQS3ojtLFDmTNJCT0N2R4U
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_2; en-US)
	AppleWebKit/532.5 (KHTML,
 like Gecko) Chrome/4.0.249.30 Safari/532.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8506
Date: 2009-12-23T15:44:29-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Dec 23, 5:18=A0pm, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 23/12/2009 14:26, in article
> 68e6e09a-9f02-4fd4-a87c-d1c43dd10...@27g2000yqr.googlegroups.com, "sjw"
> <simon.j.wri...@mac.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 23, 3:29=A0am, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
> >> What on earth has happened for GNAT to regress so badly in the face of=
 what
> >> is often described as a tidying-up and performance release of OS X?
>
> > I don't know either, because here it compiles without complaint at -O
> > {0,1,2,3}!
>
> Hmm. Interesting ...
> What could account for the difference?
> Do you have any other versions of GNAT installed in that testing
> environment?

Several! though I'd be surprised if any of them got invoked. Will
check further.