From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.107.192.66 with SMTP id q63mr4880748iof.43.1510261877219;
        Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:11:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.7.51 with SMTP id 48mr281251ote.11.1510261877121; Thu,
 09 Nov 2017 13:11:17 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!l196no657778itl.0!news-out.google.com!x87ni1259ita.0!nntp.google.com!l196no657777itl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 13:11:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ou2cdt$mtf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2003:c7:83c6:b000:e052:61fc:5a53:d240;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83c6:b000:e052:61fc:5a53:d240
References: <6a5368c5-f015-4dcb-9291-e77b40fa1bf1@googlegroups.com>
 <wcc4lq7does.fsf@TheWorld.com> <otrr5u$1rqv$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <wccd14so07t.fsf@TheWorld.com> <ou14r2$49s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <39330489-ec8b-481f-bcff-a5b7d1a2d8e3@googlegroups.com>
 <ou21f3$1bo$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <7c68eace-8a03-4bfc-806d-aa78a453f97f@googlegroups.com>
 <ou2cdt$mtf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ee798e4a-621c-452c-94b0-2905ecfb3cb9@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: some trivial questions?
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 21:11:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Body-CRC: 878616613
X-Received-Bytes: 1859
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48789
Date: 2017-11-09T13:11:16-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 21:05:21 UTC+1 schrieb Dmitry A. Kazakov:
> Also why should
> 
>     with A.B.C.D;
> 
> imply
> 
>     with A, A.B, A.B.C;

Do you think it shouldn't?

Children have direct visibility of their ancestors' visible part.
So why shouldn't "with A.B" imply "with A"?