From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.66.199.67 with SMTP id ji3mr8713071pac.17.1441825482910; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:04:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.49.225 with SMTP id x1mr149922obn.16.1441825482875; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:04:42 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!kq10no2398304igb.0!news-out.google.com!f6ni5905igi.0!nntp.google.com!kq10no2398300igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:04:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <38496571-a0b0-42d7-968e-c4436256deb0@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=188.87.39.114; posting-account=ZsBWjAoAAACn5uHwNWb19e60TrEtWbAD NNTP-Posting-Host: 188.87.39.114 References: <625c79d2-f5ed-4cd4-80ea-ea310e381017@googlegroups.com> <87y4ggm71k.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <157a8d0b-85ee-454f-a7cb-76b88ee8c474@googlegroups.com> <43ea52fd-3d08-417a-9f8a-842c366c151e@googlegroups.com> <38496571-a0b0-42d7-968e-c4436256deb0@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: working with diferent instances of the same generic interface From: Aitor Alcrudo Sangros Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 19:04:42 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27754 Date: 2015-09-09T12:04:42-07:00 List-Id: On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 6:48:35 PM UTC+2, Egil H H wrote: > No, I am saying you have two different interfaces. > Conceptually, you can think of generic instances as copies > of the source text. So being inside a generic makes them > different because the generic is instantiated twice. > > -- > ~egilhh Well, I still can't do what I wanted so that's a little disappointing.