From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,13b7917466f2d19 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-10 10:06:48 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <9a575af3.0110020747.2304ce86@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0110022002.7ccde025@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0110060639.31567261@posting.google.com> <9pr6e8$aai1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <%biw7.8780$H81.3054034106@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com> <5ee5b646.0110092223.72a80d0a@posting.google.com> Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.0 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:06:18 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:06:18 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14177 Date: 2001-10-10T17:06:18+00:00 List-Id: In article , Lutz Donnerhacke says... > >* Robert Dewar wrote: >>In fact several people *did* try to get 3.13 running on GCC 3, but no one >>came near to succeeding, which did not surprise us, since it was a huge >>amount of work, and indeed the work is still not complete. > >Of course. Still ... I did not cross a problem in the last few days. In that case, I may attempt a Windows2K build sometime soon (as soon as I reinstall my home machine's OS :-( ). What precisely is involved in downloading the sources? I have CVS installed; but is there a particular release (-r) I should use? Are there specific directories I need to grab, or would it be better to take the whole thing? Should we consider placing our prebuilt binaries somewhere for people to try out? I know it might not be great for official use, but I'd at least like to see if that dynamic dispatch bug that has been bothering me (and Tom) has indeed been fixed. I may not be the only one who'd like to try it out for similarly valid reasons. I don't know that I have enough webspace to put it on my on site (I might though). --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.