From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: f43e6,3a06c3a3721845ae X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a06c3a3721845ae X-Google-Thread: 10f5bc,3a06c3a3721845ae X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,3a06c3a3721845ae X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,gid103376,gid10f5bc,gid1108a1,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: strazzerj@netscape.net Newsgroups: comp.software-eng, comp.lang.ada, comp.software.testing, comp.object Subject: Re: Am I "Overqualified"? Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:58:21 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.170.225.200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1202137102 15762 127.0.0.1 (4 Feb 2008 14:58:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:58:22 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.170.225.200; posting-account=1wknjgkAAABqS67BFAllVJDte427E1mO User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.software-eng:9145 comp.lang.ada:19705 comp.software.testing:7546 comp.object:21970 Date: 2008-02-04T06:58:21-08:00 List-Id: On Jan 30, 4:21=A0pm, Ed Berard wrote: > Howdy Folks, > > It seems that lately, I have been turned down for an increasing number > of assignments, because I am "overqualified." > > I have been doing a good deal of "architecture tasks," as in: > > =A0 =A0* product architecture > > =A0 =A0* product line architectures > > =A0 =A0* process architectures. > > I do tend towards the more formal "C&C" viewpoints. However, I don't > think that this has much to do with my problem. > > If you want, you can chck my resume at the bottom of our home > page: > > =A0 =A0http://www.toa.com > > Any constructive feedback would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -- Ed What kind of assignments are you seeking? For these assignments, are you indeed overqualified? (iew, what are the posted job requirements?)