From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,cf7bb651bfb9d65c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-29 05:37:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: happysegfault@yahoo.com (Happy Segfault) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT Ada.Numerics.Aux question Date: 29 Jul 2003 05:37:29 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.207.253.36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1059482250 31426 127.0.0.1 (29 Jul 2003 12:37:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Jul 2003 12:37:30 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40939 Date: 2003-07-29T12:37:30+00:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol wrote in message news:... > Happy Segfault wrote: > > Why isn't Sin (X) getting the expected value in the program > > below? > > Because 3.2 has a bug with regards to sin and cos. Use Gnat 3.15p until > gcc 3.x becomes stable. > > You'll find Gnat 3.15p here: http://libre.act-europe.fr/GNAT/ Thanks for your response! I was able to find a bug in GCC's bugzilla that looks related (although it's not Ada.Numerics.Aux): http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11391 Bad news is that it's confirmed in 3.3. John