From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a24:b14a:: with SMTP id c10-v6mr1660465itj.4.1530741852175; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 15:04:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:aca:c744:: with SMTP id x65-v6mr759243oif.2.1530741852017; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 15:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!d7-v6no2083376itj.0!news-out.google.com!z3-v6ni2118iti.0!nntp.google.com!d7-v6no2083374itj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 15:04:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6af9d974-b2b4-4ab9-82e6-690ffaee2901@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.113.16.86; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.113.16.86 References: <70c11a71-3832-4f57-8127-f3f1c48a052f@googlegroups.com> <887212304.552080112.848502.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <87muvan83x.fsf@adaheads.home> <1449870001.552246132.581310.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <5de5f768-40bf-4518-a647-22788658de74@googlegroups.com> <64454862-b293-4ed7-9c3e-c8a1252344db@googlegroups.com> <0ebf920a-61fa-47e8-a34f-54da2e143bb6@googlegroups.com> <6af9d974-b2b4-4ab9-82e6-690ffaee2901@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Strange crash on custom iterator From: Shark8 Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 22:04:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53625 Date: 2018-07-04T15:04:11-07:00 List-Id: On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 at 2:05:17 PM UTC-6, Lucretia wrote: > On Wednesday, 4 July 2018 20:53:21 UTC+1, Shark8 wrote: >=20 > > But let's take a step backward; what about displaying the text? One cer= tainly could argue that Unicode is a good solution in this arena, after all= havng the ability to encode all of human language is it's stated design-go= al, so surely it must be well-suited to that, right? >=20 > You're wrong. Unicode is not about displaying text, it even says that in = the spec, it's about representation. Stop trying to force Unicode into Lisp= or Forth or whatever to try to add meaning to text. I didn't say it *was*, I used display as an example. But you bring up a good point: it's a terrible representation, for all that= I've said, and more.