From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.36.28.77 with SMTP id c74mr15518648itc.55.1511794809627; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:00:09 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.11.207 with SMTP id 73mr1687217oth.2.1511794809545; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:00:09 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!193no1060557itr.0!news-out.google.com!x87ni5336ita.0!nntp.google.com!i6no7469471itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:00:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2003:c7:83c9:d6fd:582a:5ba0:2794:19af; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83c9:d6fd:582a:5ba0:2794:19af References: <4db43571-7f86-4e73-8849-c41160927703@googlegroups.com> <6496a10f-c97e-4e42-b295-2478ad464b2f@googlegroups.com> <6106dfe6-c614-4fc1-aace-74bf8d7435e3@googlegroups.com> <102d4df8-d392-4100-9a37-c49705397e4e@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Extending a third party tagged type while adding finalization From: AdaMagica Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:00:09 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Body-CRC: 1742537040 X-Received-Bytes: 2116 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49187 Date: 2017-11-27T07:00:09-08:00 List-Id: Am Montag, 27. November 2017 13:56:36 UTC+1 schrieb Jere: > If I understand you correctly, then I think everything may be > working as intended. Yes. I didn't fully remember the contents of that paper. Everything is working as expected. > The intent was to be able to provide "overridable" Initialize > and Finalize to descendants of the mixin which would be called > automatically, but now I don't think that is possible in a safe way. Why do you say this? In my paper, Final is a further derivation, and also derivations from Final will work as expected.