From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a24:ad1:: with SMTP id 200-v6mr730848itw.48.1521196033928;
        Fri, 16 Mar 2018 03:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:29b8:: with SMTP id n53-v6mr60915otb.11.1521196033725;
 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 03:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!e10-v6no427783itf.0!news-out.google.com!a25-v6ni707itj.0!nntp.google.com!e10-v6no427782itf.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 03:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <lyfu52h6vm.fsf@pushface.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=101.164.108.182;
 posting-account=wavAeAoAAAAZF_sXSZepBukuPCBO0Zqt
NNTP-Posting-Host: 101.164.108.182
References: <lyfu52h6vm.fsf@pushface.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ec9fb3b0-0c2d-4810-9eb5-6972d3f4d783@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Fun with trampolines
From: alby.gamper@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:27:13 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1852
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1090618518
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51026
Date: 2018-03-16T03:27:13-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 5:03:28 AM UTC+11, Simon Wright wrote:
> Some of you might be entertained by my recent encounter with trampolines
> for Tcl/Tk callbacks. Always tiresome when you visit demo code after a
> few years and it doesn't work any more.
> 
> There's at least a chance that the trampoline (which exists on the
> stack) might have been trampled on, though I didn't think so when I
> checked it. The question has to be, _which_ stack is it on? I suppose it
> has to be that of the code that's executing when 'Access is taken.
> 
> https://forward-in-code.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/tcltk-vs-trampolines.html

Dear Simon

I seem to recall that GCC/GNAT recently (ie 7.1 or 7.2) removed support for
trampolines ? Could this have an effect on your legacy code ?

Alex