From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b504b0f1d6b36887 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2009 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:12:53 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <_uWdnV4tyeVKPF_UnZ2dnUVZ8qSWnZ2d@giganews.com> <49c7fe4e$0$31863$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <4h%xl.78559$4m1.41472@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.133.0.8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1237885973 19034 127.0.0.1 (24 Mar 2009 09:12:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=20.133.0.8; posting-account=g4n69woAAACHKbpceNrvOhHWViIbdQ9G User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5220 Date: 2009-03-24T02:12:53-07:00 List-Id: On 24 Mar, 06:42, a...@anon.org (anon) wrote: > I was talking about the files in gnat-gpl-2008-src.tgz which contains > GPRMAKE. > > Since Robert Duff states that GPRMAKE is obsolete then why is GPRMAKE > still there? Backwards compatibility...same as Annex J. Can you image the hassle and bad-will you'd generate with your customers by just 'pulling' a tool? Cheers -- Martin