From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,bcdd81f11a99e024 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!news.germany.com!feeder.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!130.59.10.21.MISMATCH!kanaga.switch.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!cernne03.cern.ch!cern.ch!news From: Maciej Sobczak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C to JVM, time to revive JGNAT? Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:18:29 +0200 Organization: CERN - European Laboratory for Particle Physics Message-ID: References: <20060809124902.O84175@docenti.ing.unipi.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: abpc10883.cern.ch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sunnews.cern.ch 1155194309 2476 (None) 137.138.37.241 X-Complaints-To: news@sunnews.cern.ch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060801) In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6141 Date: 2006-08-10T09:18:29+02:00 List-Id: Martin Krischik wrote: > C compiler are notorious for not complying with the > standard. Microsoft would not even implement a keyword when the minimum > support needed by the standart is "no-op" (restricted). restricted is part of C99. Does Microsoft claim that their compiler is C99? -- Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/ Programming : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/