From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd4fc3d2b22df500,start X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.66.72.131 with SMTP id d3mr8676228pav.38.1357273662686; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:27:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.216.170 with SMTP id or10mr14824423igc.15.1357273662606; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:27:42 -0800 (PST) Path: s9ni79141pbb.0!nntp.google.com!b8no1945476pbd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:27:42 -0800 (PST) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=150.101.201.124; posting-account=pBdvJAoAAAAbTiQ-L1tpxD99i_UttsrJ NNTP-Posting-Host: 150.101.201.124 User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: On Style: Any opinions on *not* capitalising the first letter of verbs in a procedure name ? From: Rod Kay Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 04:27:42 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2013-01-03T20:27:42-08:00 List-Id: Hi folks, I've been trialling this style and come to like it. An example would be ... declare package Integer_Vectors is new Ada.Containers.Vectors (Positive, Integer); Integers : Integer_Vectors.Vector; begin Integers.reserve_Capacity; Integers.clear; end; The idea is to only capitalise the noun parts of the procedure name. It's a minor thing I guess, yet I find code a little easier to read when used. On the other hand, the half dozen Ada people I've discussed the style with have been dubious at best. So any thoughts ? ... good, bad or ugly ? regards.