From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7178a81f7769b555 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AdaOpenGL and AdaMultimedia References: <1190229087.588.18.camel@localhost> <1n1wcsoi0z.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <7cYIi.59$bd6.13@news.get2net.dk> <1190446816.670767.149400@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> From: Markus E L Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:11:39 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Uf9e4y0jpTvFtaXneDQ4hX0M3bs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.202.216 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1190459202 88.72.202.216 (22 Sep 2007 13:06:42 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2088 Date: 2007-09-22T13:11:39+02:00 List-Id: Tomek Wa kuski wrote: > On 22 Wrz, 01:10, Poul-Erik Andreasen wrote: >> None of them are alowed, you can not make a BSD licence to >> a LGPL or GMGPL ( at least not this one); >> > We were discussing about it in topic "Ada and licensing" - IMO he can > apply BSD license to bindings (and only to them), but... it is > useless, because original code is GPLed and future code which uses > adaopengl bindings also should be GPL. You completely lost me there, because some posts earlier in the thread I find: ||| That's not a god idea since the original is a ||| BSD'style licens :-) ? - Markus