From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa17c2bd3c0ec0f7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news1.google.com!news.germany.com!newsfeed.cw.net!cw.net!news-FFM2.ecrc.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail From: Michael Bode Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Qt4Ada: Qt for Ada Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:50:05 +0200 Organization: 1&1 Internet AG Message-ID: References: <44cb39a1$0$32184$636a55ce@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: p54af24e6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: online.de 1154209805 18939 84.175.36.230 (29 Jul 2006 21:50:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:50:05 +0000 (UTC) X-message-flag: IMPORTANT MESSAGE -- PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY!!! X-Accepted-File-Formats: ASCII, .rtf, .ps, .pdf - *NO* MS Office files User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6020 Date: 2006-07-29T23:50:05+02:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol writes: > Does it matter if QT4Ada is GMGPL when QT is GPL? I mean shouldn't > QT4Ada then be dual licensed so that whether one use the QT GPL or > non-GPL version one do not get problems? Of course it does matter. If Qt4Ada is GPL, you can't use it for CSS even if you buy a Qt license. For this reason I'd prefer something that is GTK+ based. And I consider GtkAda under GPL like the tail wagging the dog. After all GTK+ does the real work and it is LGPL. Now comes one of a dozen or so language bindings and shows people how to do Free Software. -- Michael Bode