From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,a83584e000bc28fa X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.66.74.102 with SMTP id s6mr1949891pav.21.1345450270394; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 01:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Path: g9ni110907574pbo.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!news-peer1!btnet!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!plix.pl!newsfeed2.plix.pl!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!novso.com!nerim.net!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!74.125.178.16.MISMATCH!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Ada novice Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada lapack Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <12f929e9-eea3-4dc9-b10d-71e4f5732e0d@googlegroups.com> <615dd222-9c8b-4878-94f7-b1cd4792bd3e@googlegroups.com> <36bc4009-6240-4797-991c-b72ec290cedc@googlegroups.com> <12606f3f-aec1-489c-8325-18e13007b6a6@googlegroups.com> <11959826-e12e-4455-b9d9-1ac4dcaf2952@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.240.232.139 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1345203185 18557 127.0.0.1 (17 Aug 2012 11:33:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:33:05 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=130.240.232.139; posting-account=Rr9I-QoAAACS-nOzpA-mGxtAlZ46Nb6I User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-08-17T04:33:05-07:00 List-Id: On Friday, August 17, 2012 12:08:38 PM UTC+1, Niklas Holsti wrote: > In your first try, the shell did not find the executable, so the actual > > output file (./example01.txt) became empty, and "diff" showed all the > > lines in the reference file (output/example01.txt) as "difference" lines. Thanks. Yes we have the diff command just afterwards in the Makefile. YC