From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.36.83.11 with SMTP id n11mr5597408itb.48.1518030727735; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:12:07 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.14.146 with SMTP id 18mr322152otj.10.1518030727669; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:12:07 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!o66no463603ita.0!news-out.google.com!s63ni672itb.0!nntp.google.com!o66no463602ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 11:12:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1f892095-01a6-47f2-97aa-24c45e6dc306@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.113.16.86; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.113.16.86 References: <40a33f37-7a25-4587-a80e-2ef5f7528264@googlegroups.com> <1f892095-01a6-47f2-97aa-24c45e6dc306@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Reducing the cost of real-time software through a cyclic task abstraction for Ada From: Shark8 Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 19:12:07 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Body-CRC: 4146338849 X-Received-Bytes: 1809 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50320 Date: 2018-02-07T11:12:07-08:00 List-Id: On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 11:25:48 AM UTC-7, Lucretia wrote: > Well, I was going to reply to the deleted message. I didn't even see the deleted message. > > I scanned down this massive doc, this looks like a callback mechanism from an anonymous task. Hm, I don't think that's nearly what's going on here (I've read most of it) because there's refinements which allow better worst-case analysis AND open up the possibility for more varied scheduling in SPARK.