From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5e062f5bcdb88fd8,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.germany.com!newsfeed.cw.net!cw.net!news-FFM2.ecrc.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail
From: michael bode <michael.bode@laserline.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: gnat 3.15p/Windows and tasking bug
Date: 24 Jul 2006 15:06:32 +0200
Organization: 1&1 Internet AG
Message-ID: <ea2gl4$r6n$1@online.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9e11c95.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: online.de 1153746404 27863 217.225.28.149 (24 Jul 2006 13:06:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:06:44 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5896
Date: 2006-07-24T15:06:32+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I (and Google) remember a discussion about a bug in gnat 3.15p for
Windows regarding tasking and delay statements that delay much longer
than they should sometimes. What I don't remember and also did not
find through Google was a precise description and if there was a
workaround or some success using gcc-gnat 3.4.x (3.4.5 is the current
MinGW version I think). 

To be precise I found references to TWO such bugs one of them was
limited to rather old mainboards or chipsets. I'm searching for
information on the other bug.