From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!enother.net!enother.net!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx19.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64;
 rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL is not shareware
References: <87bnmetex4.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <79f3eff7-2b45-40ae-af94-fa9a17426d82@googlegroups.com>
 <87bnmd8mg2.fsf@ixod.org>
 <19cf9bc2-f8b9-4735-b427-7b070dda59da@googlegroups.com>
 <qfbmaal82onf3ho5otthp0m6vbraaavoq5@4ax.com>
 <ohGqw.195991$rq4.58661@fx27.iad>
 <fa17b731-a99f-4d51-b7e9-806bb2de00c6@googlegroups.com>
 <s7Jqw.1026393$Lj7.973937@fx22.iad>
 <alpine.DEB.2.11.1501061414310.19142@debian> <m8gtr1$rg1$1@dont-email.me>
 <m8h6gn$202$1@dont-email.me> <iWXqw.180018$Sn4.103298@fx10.iad>
 <m8hj8p$qn2$1@dont-email.me> <FIYqw.1051175$FX2.802392@fx18.iad>
 <m8j3k5$gr9$1@dont-email.me> <qcdrw.1246475$Y4.224981@fx24.iad>
 <m8kd1u$lkc$1@loke.gir.dk> <1otenmcbgnvlt$.dn9361nl2jm8$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <m8lnlg$eat$1@dont-email.me> <8ryfky4awox2$.q2gfw4pvsgau.dlg@40tude.net>
 <m8m3ge$sg3$1@dont-email.me> <v7sijsm038wt.rnnn8jo6j2nj$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <m8om3v$2ga$1@dont-email.me> <m8pj7k$524$1@loke.gir.dk>
In-Reply-To: <m8pj7k$524$1@loke.gir.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <eFZrw.1020853$No4.1016889@fx19.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 23:39:54 UTC
Organization: TeraNews.com
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:39:51 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2149
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3609739041
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:191823
Date: 2015-01-09T16:39:51-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 09-Jan-15 15:03, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> And it probably would have problems
> with macro-expanded generics vs. code-shared generics (again, which ASIS has
> in spades) - either you duplicate the definitions, so you no longer have a
> 1-to-1 relation of identifiers to source, or you don't, and you have
> multiple versions of the same thing.

I haven't read anything about the DIANA based systems having trouble 
with generics/instantiations in my research. -- Do you have some 
experience or stories about them? Could you elaborate on the problems of 
ASIS w/ generics?