From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,534dd301375921ac X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.204.157.134 with SMTP id b6mr559779bkx.5.1339714799067; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Path: e27ni48978bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.131.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder.erje.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is Text_IO.Put_Line() thread-safe? Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:38:55 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: References: <93201f1a-d668-485e-83b4-492bc283f36e@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-06-14T16:38:55+02:00 List-Id: On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:49:45 -0400, Robert A Duff wrote: > It's a good idea to put an exception handler at the bottom of every > task body, and do some debugging output there. Otherwise, an > exception will cause the task to silently vanish. This is a > language design flaw. It would be nice if the exception would propagate in the task's master, but that is impossible without a rendezvous or asynchronous control transfer on the master's side. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de