From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.36.16.21 with SMTP id 21mr17535993ity.37.1516278098234;
        Thu, 18 Jan 2018 04:21:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.114.140 with SMTP id t12mr205440otj.4.1516278098027;
 Thu, 18 Jan 2018 04:21:38 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!w142no246340ita.0!news-out.google.com!s63ni406itb.0!nntp.google.com!g80no246522itg.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 04:21:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <p3q1v8$8f2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=85.245.162.133;
 posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.245.162.133
References: <d66b4a89-dc02-4c04-a5bf-6dd4f2ef9f86@googlegroups.com>
 <7e895632-e0f9-4035-a0a3-1a31a262c8b3@googlegroups.com>
 <p3ntmv$16u6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <6e4679ff-6058-40ec-821a-791507313906@googlegroups.com>
 <p3pm77$1jvi$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <lymv1b2zbp.fsf@pushface.org> <p3q1v8$8f2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e9c28605-b13f-4b7f-b71d-11570e84dff4@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: ADA.STRINGS.INDEX_ERROR : a-strunb.adb:782
From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:21:38 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1628033454
X-Received-Bytes: 1756
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49975
Date: 2018-01-18T04:21:37-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>     function "'Image" (X : Integer) return String; 
>     X'Image <=> "'Image" (X)

I read that idea several times here and elsewhere. It seems logical indeed. Has it been directly refused ? If so what was their rational ?