From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4fe0da28a190b761
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!f37g2000pri.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: sjw <simon.j.wright@mac.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Storage management
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:34:59 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <e95a9e59-3a92-442f-a66d-3ca5820451e6@f37g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <87fxmbog1u.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de><wccej1vw07f.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
	<87abciurrl.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <gf04q8$nfm$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
	<13hpf6ht4tl2m$.1su6rgr67eb2o$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <c69aec9a-cb89-426c-9f64-3c223ba0d389@c22g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
	<1avtc1i0diz5e$.1c1bapci5o5mm.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.133.0.13
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1226309700 13999 127.0.0.1 (10 Nov 2008 09:35:00
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:35:00 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f37g2000pri.googlegroups.com; posting-host=20.133.0.13;
	posting-account=_RXWmAoAAADQS3ojtLFDmTNJCT0N2R4U
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.3)
	Gecko/2008092417 Firefox/3.0.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2630
Date: 2008-11-10T01:34:59-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 8 Nov, 12:33, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 03:04:24 -0800 (PST), sjw wrote:
> > Also, in deliverable code -- the abortable_part was waiting for a PO
> > to be triggered by an interrupt (or not).
>
> Hmm, why ATC rather than a timed entry call?

I was remembering a previous version of this code -- we now do exactly
as you say.