From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ca52c8981c1b86a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?B?SG/DoG5nIMSQw6xuaCBMb25n?= <long.hdi@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: One other possible reason for the C predominance
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <e8ffd2cb-bbb4-42e9-894d-64692cdc9f43@r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
References: <op.vsps27ruule2fv@index.ici>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 113.160.106.217
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1300806363 3389 127.0.0.1 (22 Mar 2011 15:06:03
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:06:03 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=113.160.106.217;
 posting-account=paWW-woAAABZ2b_q4k_Ldv6hEcjqv5lX
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US)
 AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML,
 like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.151 Safari/534.16,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18368
Date: 2011-03-22T08:06:02-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I think this post will give some ideas about programming languages of
the future.

http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Future-of-Programming-Languages

One of the presenter said that there were many programming languages
out there but they are not concentrated enough on security. Another
one said we had many approaches towards concurrent programming but
none proved to be the best.