From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.66.162.134 with SMTP id ya6mr157822pab.7.1377720980312; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:16:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.101.5 with SMTP id fc5mr161835qeb.25.1377720980038; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:16:20 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!news.glorb.com!n2no6641658pbg.1!news-out.google.com!z6ni21921pbu.0!nntp.google.com!fx3no5896711qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:16:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=206.53.78.59; posting-account=ShYTIAoAAABytvcS76ZrG9GdaV-nXYKy NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.53.78.59 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Anonymous access types are evil, why? From: sbelmont700@gmail.com Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:16:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:17030 Date: 2013-08-28T13:16:19-07:00 List-Id: On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 7:49:56 AM UTC-4, ake.ragna...@gmail.com wrot= e: >=20 > What are the conclusions we can draw? >=20 If you are going to use an AAT, always make sure you have a valid reason fo= r doing it and understand the ramifications. They are a specific tool for = providing specific behavior in specific circumstances, not just a general s= yntax shortcut to avoid having to properly declare your types. -sb