From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.52.28.5 with SMTP id x5mr48391202vdg.3.1438269690561;
 Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.81.38 with SMTP id e35mr176262qgd.3.1438269690542; Thu,
 30 Jul 2015 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!69no2834285qgl.1!news-out.google.com!78ni151qge.1!nntp.google.com!69no2834280qgl.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <c8321f5c-71e0-46cc-a04d-a20f848983bd@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=81.203.145.32;
 posting-account=AFCLjAoAAABJAOf_HjgEEEi3ty-lG5m2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.203.145.32
References: <e610ca1e-4df6-4fbb-b3a1-ac35694d9072@googlegroups.com>
 <mp645u$abo$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <2df4698f-4c8e-457c-822d-209cb2f8ab5e@googlegroups.com>
 <mp8r8l$fnn$1@loke.gir.dk> <lywpxjxxza.fsf@pushface.org>
 <mpbb7i$vmi$1@loke.gir.dk> <lybneuya0a.fsf@pushface.org>
 <c8321f5c-71e0-46cc-a04d-a20f848983bd@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e803c369-7e9b-47d8-b78c-6f0b11814dfe@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Running a preprocessor from GPS?
From: EGarrulo <egarrulo@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:21:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:194525
Date: 2015-07-30T08:21:30-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 5:13:18 PM UTC+2, EGarrulo wrote:
> KISS solution:
> 
>        TickCount := (if System.FreeRTOS.Tasks.In_ISR
>                      then xTaskGetTickCountFromISR
>                      else xTaskGetTickCount)
>        return Tick * Time_Base (TickCount);
> 
>
> I think that the latter form is more
> readable.

Wait!  It seems more a problem of formatting.  This looks
the best:

    TickCount := (if System.FreeRTOS.Tasks.In_ISR then
                     xTaskGetTickCountFromISR
                  else
                     xTaskGetTickCount);

And it would work well with the original solution, too:

return Tick * Time_Base (if System.FreeRTOS.Tasks.In_ISR then
                            xTaskGetTickCountFromISR
                         else 
                            xTaskGetTickCount);