From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1769ac558c6fa259
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-22 05:31:49 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: karlran1234@yahoo.com (Karl Ran)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to speed up stream & record handling?
Date: 22 Feb 2002 05:31:47 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <e7ebd224.0202220531.3755e013@posting.google.com>
References: <87it8qeg4q.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
 <8Rfd8.41459$Cu.776895529@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.134.28.135
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1014384709 26317 127.0.0.1 (22 Feb 2002 13:31:49
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Feb 2002 13:31:49 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20250
Date: 2002-02-22T13:31:49+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

tmoran@acm.org wrote in message
news:<8Rfd8.41459$Cu.776895529@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>...
>> Data_array'Read (and thus My_Record'Read) calls Unsigned_8'Read for
>> each array element individually.  Perhaps this burns a lot of CPU
> I suspect you're right.  I ran the program as given on a 750MHz Windows
> system and it took 7.7 seconds.  It runs in .13 seconds with some
> simple changes:

Same here!

So, whats the problem with the streams?
Was the streams-package not designed to handle high-bandwidth application?
Does the used compiler matters?

How do I avoid calling 'Unsigned_8'Read' 200 times per packet while still
using streams?

Thanks,
Karl