From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ed4c57426e16006 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y12g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Gautier write-only Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GtkAda using Glade Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 17:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <15ff2ec1-5a2b-4d24-8aab-cf7985b6374f@t19g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <2e496d2c-f12f-4961-981b-2162fdf1ce1e@k3g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <1vakqa4gwjxry$.9j72428ewqp0.dlg@40tude.net> <1npn5zwqehpsz.1lqame09nycx1.dlg@40tude.net> <96992149-4b0b-4de3-b928-545baa8da5ad@y12g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.203.96.29 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1305851216 10823 127.0.0.1 (20 May 2011 00:26:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y12g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.203.96.29; posting-account=gRqrnQkAAAAC_02ynnhqGk1VRQlve6ZG User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.342.9 Safari/533.2,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:20298 Date: 2011-05-19T17:26:56-07:00 List-Id: On 19 mai, 09:36, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote: > That's the point. If the GUI logic could be separated from the program > logic, which is a Holy Grail, but absolutely unrealistic, then it would be > no matter in which language the stuff was generated, Ada or C. You would > not never look at it. > > Unfortunately the reality is that the GUI and the functional part of the > program are tightly interwoven. Therefore you need to be in full control of > both and want to shape the program's structure as you want for the sake of > clear design and maintainability (Ada's strengths). Any automatically > generated code is just an obstacle here. > > Sorry for sounding daemon's voice again. (:-)) I hope the smiley also applies to the last paragraph as well, and that you are joking by saying "any automatically generated code is just an obstacle here"... ______________________________________________________________________________ Gautier's Ada programming -- http://gautiersblog.blogspot.com/search/label/Ada NB: follow the above link for a valid e-mail address