From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7614:: with SMTP id g20mr1563580iom.14.1554301893673; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 07:31:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:aca:48d0:: with SMTP id v199mr442025oia.51.1554301893408; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 07:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.166.216.MISMATCH!136no7869itk.0!news-out.google.com!l81ni21itl.0!nntp.google.com!78no7823itl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 07:31:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.255.209.31; posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.255.209.31 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Intervention needed? From: Optikos Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 14:31:33 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56054 Date: 2019-04-03T07:31:33-07:00 List-Id: On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 3:29:22 AM UTC-4, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 2019-04-03 00:07, Randy Brukardt wrote: > > > Does anyone spend much time in a debugger when writing Ada? > > Well if there were a working one. GDB does not count. > > I am using tracing, but there are few cases where debugger could be > easier to use. In the debugger you could inspect the states of variables > and of other tasks. And you don't need to modify the code. Which feature(s) [that other debuggers have] do you think are missing from GDB when debugging Ada? Which are the better-than-GDB debuggers for Ada that you have seen?