From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c32fe290813aec20 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "framefritti@gmail.com" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: (slightly OT) Open Source licences? (was: Re: New Ada portable GUI Library?) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:36:48 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <6d63c543-0a35-4c39-a330-98c63a24f64d@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.101.126.216 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1200163008 31399 127.0.0.1 (12 Jan 2008 18:36:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.101.126.216; posting-account=9fwclgkAAAD6oQ5usUYhee1l39geVY99 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.23 (X11; Linux i686; U; en),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19355 Date: 2008-01-12T10:36:48-08:00 List-Id: On Jan 12, 2:37=A0pm, Tomek Walkuski wrote: > Hi, > > someone wrote about need such kind of simple, non-GPL in "The future > of Ada is at risk" thread. > Sorry, this is not an answer to your question, but another (slightly OT) question that yours triggered. I have an old C++ library of mine (for computations with rings, fields and algebraic stuff). Triggered by the discussion "future of Ada" I am thinking to rewrite it in Ada (ok, maybe symbolic computation is not very important in business applications, but there is where my skills live). I would like to make the library available with an open-source licence, but not GPL since I understand that the clause that any derivative work must be GPLed (maybe I am not precise here, but please do not flame me ;-) keeps professional away from GPLed library. After such a long introduction my question finally arrives: can you suggest any open-source licence which could be used in this case ? (and maybe in other Ada libraries to be developed) Thanks 16#3E8# PS: no flame, please... :-)