From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.germany.com!news.belwue.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!unknown!not-for-mail From: Thomas Koenig Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: Bounds Check Overhead Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 20:53:41 +0200 (CEST) Organization: Private site Sender: ig25@meiner.onlinehome.de Message-ID: References: <1hfv5wb.1x4ab1tbdzk7eN%nospam@see.signature> NNTP-Posting-Host: p50861ad1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de X-Trace: online.de 1148669620 22009 80.134.26.209 (26 May 2006 18:53:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 18:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4506 comp.lang.fortran:10305 Date: 2006-05-26T20:53:41+02:00 List-Id: Rich Townsend wrote: >in particular, if the called subroutines have INTENT() on their arguments, then >its pretty cut-and-dry whether I will be modified or not. How, excactly, will you be modified by having an intentional argument? SCNR, Thomas