From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.182.92.226 with SMTP id cp2mr13238238obb.44.1425032921187;
        Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:28:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.140.95.177 with SMTP id i46mr93137qge.3.1425032921082; Fri,
 27 Feb 2015 02:28:41 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!hl2no33512461igb.0!news-out.google.com!n6ni190qar.0!nntp.google.com!j7no8355696qaq.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:28:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <mckkkm$p1e$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=91.55.227.135;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.55.227.135
References: <mcfp8d$5j8$1@dont-email.me> <87y4nn6vpg.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <mcifuj$dq8$1@dont-email.me>
 <5ed1d53a-de95-4fc3-8d03-85ebfa3d4e58@googlegroups.com>
 <mckkkm$p1e$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e43c2238-cf1d-411d-b16f-f8e1f16f972c@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Stackoverflow answer in need of update?
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:28:41 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:25053
Date: 2015-02-27T02:28:40-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015 15:02:41 UTC+1 schrieb J-P. Rosen:
> Le 25/02/2015 14:14, AdaMagica a =E9crit :
> >> Program units yes, but not compilation units. Watchout the vocabulary =
;-)
> > Hm, there is no syntactical categorie program_unit. There is
> Syntactical no, but see 10.1(1)

Of course, but there is no direct relation to compilation units. Program un=
its are included in compilation units, some distributed over many compilati=
on units (think of cascading separates).