From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a0be06fbc0dd71f1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l1g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Graham Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The future of Ada is at risk Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:24:33 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <20071229040639.f753f982.coolzone@it.dk> <878x3436pj.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <1199531506.9355.8.camel@K72> <1199539751.9355.46.camel@K72> <1xu2jerm6vwjv.mt6we9a8wu5q.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.154.65.191 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1199823873 24788 127.0.0.1 (8 Jan 2008 20:24:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l1g2000hsa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.154.65.191; posting-account=04rmagoAAABZ9PN7u3MdbKIs6DPG57E- User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20061201 Firefox/2.0.0.11 (Ubuntu-feisty),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19277 Date: 2008-01-08T12:24:33-08:00 List-Id: On Jan 7, 12:11 am, Brian May wrote: > >>>>> "Dmitry" == Dmitry A Kazakov writes: > > Dmitry> [ I think that the issue with static typing can be resolved. Of course the > Dmitry> best way would be a support for anonymous record types (tuples). But there > Dmitry> exist also possibilities to use generics or else to have abstract base > Dmitry> tagged types for cells.] > > My preference for implementing such a system would be to have a > pre-compiler that compiles the basic table definitions into Ada code > that can be compiled with the rest of the application (e.g. like IDL > compilers). > > That way you get static type checking, minimal run-time overhead, etc. > > However, I suspect that I just turned off a lot of people who don't > like pre-compilers. > -- > Brian May I wrote a little system like this and posted it to the Gnade list the other day. http://www.virtual-worlds.org.uk/downloads/mill.tgz It's fairly preliminary, but works for me. Graham