From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6609c40f81b32989 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Adam Beneschan Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:04:41 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1270566281 17140 127.0.0.1 (6 Apr 2010 15:04:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122; posting-account=duW0ogkAAABjRdnxgLGXDfna0Gc6XqmQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9894 Date: 2010-04-06T08:04:41-07:00 List-Id: On Apr 3, 10:30=A0pm, "J-P. Rosen" wrote: > This kind of remark comes generally from hear-say of people who never > had a serious look at Ada. Unfortunately, it is easier to repeat a rumor > than to investigate seriously... What's really sad is when a physics professor does that. Aren't scientists supposed to be the ones who test and investigate things? -- Adam