From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1fe4bc1dd51fc87 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Eric Hughes Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: User-defined type attributes (replacing genericity) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <30f629fd-69d3-4d40-995f-9933f52b8dad@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <965suhjl0bxt$.74se2ylyksin.dlg@40tude.net> <1205505100.6445.60.camel@K72> <821256cd-2d20-46dd-92d2-cdd21181dbb8@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <199nmfx3bkxkf$.1sllgktbwkbur.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.70.57.218 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1205525987 28121 127.0.0.1 (14 Mar 2008 20:19:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=166.70.57.218; posting-account=5RIiTwoAAACt_Eu87gmPAJMoMTeMz-rn User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080201 Firefox/2.0.0.12,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20396 Date: 2008-03-14T13:19:47-07:00 List-Id: On Mar 14, 12:58 pm, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote: > Anyway semantically > there is no any difference between generic and class-wide bodies. Both act > on a class of types. Not every similarity between types is also a class-wide similarity. Without this essential distinction, I cannot begin to have a useful discussion about generics. I'm out. Eric