From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.66.100.196 with SMTP id fa4mr10751312pab.11.1407450000599; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:20:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.27.148 with SMTP id 20mr36597qgx.35.1407450000540; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!h18no15846272igc.0!news-out.google.com!j6ni34289qas.0!nntp.google.com!j15no5378935qaq.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:20:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <472a5732-3dc9-4c08-8bda-00720375a2a9@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.240.202.21; posting-account=sDyr7QoAAAA7hiaifqt-gaKY2K7OZ8RQ NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.240.202.21 References: <85a97spo1c.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <92dd7d22-a7da-44d7-9c40-b3aa62881683@googlegroups.com> <4f431041-5292-434d-988e-46d69f4800f8@googlegroups.com> <472a5732-3dc9-4c08-8bda-00720375a2a9@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem with generic linked list package From: Laurent Injection-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 22:20:00 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21523 Date: 2014-08-07T15:20:00-07:00 List-Id: I thought that if the package was instantiated with an integer for element_= type, "<" defined for element_type would "see" that oh yes I know how to co= mpare 2 integers and use the "<" defined in the standart package for intege= rs. Same for char, float whatever. Didn't think that "<" element_type could be chasing his own tail. Perhaps I am just to naive to believe that the compiler knows what I want = to do.