From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d69f4a8070dd707 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-14 16:30:00 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: aek@vib.usr.pu.ru (Alexander Kopilovitch) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AIs for Ada extensions Date: 14 Jun 2003 16:30:00 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: <3EDC8FA6.2000308@noplace.com> <3EDFAC9F.5040802@cogeco.ca> <3EE5C45B.700@noplace.com> <3EE6CCA2.9010109@attbi.com> <3EE8B62E.6090605@attbi.com> <3EE97B4F.3030104@attbi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.242.17.164 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1055633400 839 127.0.0.1 (14 Jun 2003 23:30:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jun 2003 23:30:00 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39184 Date: 2003-06-14T23:30:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert I. Eachus wrote: >... >Notice that we have created a >binding between one abstraction Lists, and another, AVL_Trees, that >never explicitly uses the new interface feature to implement multiple >inheritance. >... >The "overhead" of making the list view >explicit makes maintenance much easier. Yes, all that is fine. But I was much more concerned with basic use of abstract interfaces (such as in your AVL_Trees example) for containers than with multiple inheritance. Anyway, now after reading (and rereading -:) your posting, I think that I got what I wanted: there is a chance that ARG will pay some attention to the interactions between AI-251 and AI-302, and will not consider them as completely independent from each other. Alexander Kopilovitch aek@vib.usr.pu.ru Saint-Petersburg Russia