From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6e97963d32ee242 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-21 19:31:42 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: aek@vib.usr.pu.ru (Alexander Kopilovitch) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The old "Object.Method" syntax debate Date: 21 May 2003 19:31:41 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: <254c16a.0305210726.485125de@posting.google.com> <3ECBA778.4070909@crs4.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.152.65.143 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1053570702 17248 127.0.0.1 (22 May 2003 02:31:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 May 2003 02:31:42 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37621 Date: 2003-05-22T02:31:42+00:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol wrote: >Perhaps somebody else can show my why this is a Good Idea[tm] For me, this is a step in right direction -- towards "properties" of an object (well, "properties" of a type or class) in the sense of Delphi (and then C#). Alexander Kopilovitch aek@vib.usr.pu.ru Saint-Petersburg Russia