From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!u19g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Type of the target of an assignment shall not be abstract
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:12:02 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <e26d58d5-36f1-4566-9e9a-b1b0595a4a45@u19g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <770863d9-14ae-4a05-b924-2dfeda7a96a8@f15g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
	<39f56354-a2e2-4133-bbad-9343b2f22119@k6g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
	<fbc13ca9-5967-42f4-8efd-b423672c3dab@z10g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
	<bb14092c-3a1a-48fd-88de-69bf8b719ed6@g19g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1266336722 28414 127.0.0.1 (16 Feb 2010 16:12:02
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:12:02 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: u19g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122;
	posting-account=duW0ogkAAABjRdnxgLGXDfna0Gc6XqmQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64;
	SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR
	3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9267
Date: 2010-02-16T08:12:02-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 16, 2:03=A0am, Gautier write-only <gautier_niou...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On 16 Feb., 01:59, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com>:
>
> > FYI, I asked about this on Ada-Comment, and got a response from
> > Randy. =A0[...]
>
> Thanks!
> IHMO, no need to worry about how well or not the standard handles
> that.
> To answer my original question, can I conclude that GNAT is wrong on
> that case, and that I can send a report ?

Yes, if GNAT is accepting this, then it's wrong.

                                -- Adam