From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1a5713afb4e5c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: JPWoodruff@gmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: An easy way to simple scientific plots (in Ada)? Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:19:43 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <41bd2384-83a7-46ff-87e9-d726623633e9@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <11krr3a27y407$.zt0a32up5ny$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.25.248.240 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1198779584 17373 127.0.0.1 (27 Dec 2007 18:19:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:19:44 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.25.248.240; posting-account=eLk0BgoAAAA-yA75xm1L7heSizMaESVg User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19037 Date: 2007-12-27T10:19:43-08:00 List-Id: On Dec 27, 2:10 am, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote: > On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:07:29 -0800 (PST), JPWoodr...@gmail.com wrote: > > I tried to follow Jeff's suggestion - installed fresh new gtkada2.8 > > from adacore, then installed fresh Win_IO 3.0 from its source. > > For what it is worth, the latest available GtkAda is 2.10. > So there should be some version incompatibilities. Win_IO refers to GtkAda > 2.4. I was a little bit thoughtful about that when I chose 2.8 before 2.10. My short look did not show me a v2.4 > I think you should ask the maintainers to review the code in order to > make it compatible with 2.10. > That's going to me my next plan. John