From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,5f6322415d6639e0 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!s1g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: sjw Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Will the defect with formal package parameters be fixed in GNAT GPL 2009? Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:20:54 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <558b7171-809b-4259-8679-4b4cff9de519@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.20.239.89 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1240860055 6065 127.0.0.1 (27 Apr 2009 19:20:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: s1g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.20.239.89; posting-account=_RXWmAoAAADQS3ojtLFDmTNJCT0N2R4U User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_6; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.27.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.2.1 Safari/525.27.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5567 Date: 2009-04-27T12:20:54-07:00 List-Id: On Apr 27, 3:47=A0pm, Eric Hughes wrote: > My question, a very simple yes-or-no one, is this: Is this defect > corrected for a presumed 2009 release of GNAT GPL edition? When you posted this before, I asked what the Bugzilla (or other) ref was that you'd posted the bug report under. You replied saying that _I_ was welcome to post a bug report. I guess the gentle hint wasn't enough Newsflash: it's _your_ problem, _you_ post the bug report! (and if you didn't, why are you surprised that it's not fixed?)