From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1d0e6fa19045a321 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-12 06:08:15 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: almroth@attglobal.net (Andreas Almroth) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT 3.13p build for Solaris 8_x86 Date: 12 Jul 2001 06:08:14 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: <5ee5b646.0107111915.222cebe2@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.237.151.24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 994943295 14111 127.0.0.1 (12 Jul 2001 13:08:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-support@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Jul 2001 13:08:15 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9869 Date: 2001-07-12T13:08:15+00:00 List-Id: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) wrote in message news:... > In article <5ee5b646.0107111915.222cebe2@posting.google.com>, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes: > > almroth@attglobal.net (Andreas Almroth) wrote in message news:... > > >> OK, if you have the time, you could compile 3.13p from 3.12p level, > >> which is exactly what I have done now... Everything seems to work so > >> far... It is not verified/certified in any way, but it works for > >> me... > > > > OK, good work, it's really not that hard! And for the public version > > it really does not matter that it is not validated (indeed none of > > the public versions of GNAT are validated). > > I was under the impression that the validation tests are available to > all. If you were to run the tests yourself, some people might not be > satisfied they were not run by the official testing site ($10,000 a > pop ?). But presumable other people, including especially _you_ would > be satisfied. Well, they are available for everyone interested at; http:/adaic.org/compilers/testing.html But I have found that they are using another naming convention for source files, than GNAT usually use. I'm sure there is a toolset for converting it to GNAT naming convention. It is probably easily done with a simple perl script that reads the package declaration, and then renames the file accordingly. Anyway, I don't think I'm really up for this one. A bit too heavy for a normal programmer... Would be fun though, even though the results would never count... If anyone else have done this for GNAT before, that is, having the ACVC 2.3 ready for GNAT, then I would be more than happy to run it on my laptop, just for the fun of it... Meanwhile, I think I will continue on my original work, now that I have 3.13p working... :) Cheers, Andreas