From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c424d8135e68278
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-12 05:32:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada2005
Date: 12 Dec 2001 06:42:05 -0600
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <e0Lhwm+qo0Uv@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <9v4jsj$bd1$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
 <9v7f26$qn2$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1008160926 868 192.135.80.34 (12 Dec 2001
 12:42:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:42:06 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17826
Date: 2001-12-12T06:42:05-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <9v7f26$qn2$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>, Peter Hermann <ica2ph@iris16.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> writes:
> Peter Hermann <ica2ph@iris16.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote:
>> What about fixing it to Ada2005?
> 
> some clarification:
> 
> Ada9X was called in this way, because the X=5 was not known before.
> 
> Every industry standard has to be revised every 10 years (ISO).

I presume that is "revised or reaffirmed".

> The current Ada95 standard is excellent enough to not needing
> urgent revision.

Perhaps the ISO requirement would be met by revising the Ada95 standard
to include any AIs that had been approved since 1995.