From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,640b65cbfbab7216 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Eric Hughes Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada.Strings.Bounded Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <9a3ad8ca-9f44-42db-9f7c-c5f9e3ee60f3@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1jdzw15tbj376$.nyv9yml75wj4$.dlg@40tude.net> <80c6fdca-1a89-4d98-b61d-9a405e57d8e5@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1wh7cbu67y4wz$.7iu8likx0fct.dlg@40tude.net> <144w648u50r6q.1erjxxu0cplbw.dlg@40tude.net> <611360e0-595c-43a7-b5cb-137a278ec0c1@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <15389tuelo6x6$.1c1a6yixordts$.dlg@40tude.net> <4c1be2a2-0178-4c1f-8c96-526020550f42@w4g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <15514187-d7d0-4650-a058-13ec5684be2c@w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1w2xd1u1j4e5e$.137isx6aepjiu.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.70.57.218 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1208824298 29328 127.0.0.1 (22 Apr 2008 00:31:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=166.70.57.218; posting-account=5RIiTwoAAACt_Eu87gmPAJMoMTeMz-rn User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21025 Date: 2008-04-21T17:31:37-07:00 List-Id: > On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:35:36 -0700 (PDT), Eric Hughes wrote: > > ARM 2.4.1 "Decimal Literals" > > has no length limitation on 'numeral'. On Apr 21, 12:50 pm, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote: > Hmm, I don't see it saying this. Do you mean that the syntax rule specifies > not limit? That's right. The language places no limit on the length of numerals. See Bob Duff's "nit" for a qualification. Every compiler will have some limit, but that doesn't affect the language definition. Eric