From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bdf72b2364b0da13
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.73.229 with SMTP id o5mr12536863pbv.7.1323783489622;
        Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:38:09 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni17862pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!j10g2000vbe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ada BRL <ada.brl.2011@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Interrupts handling in ADA
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:36:15 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <e0513ad2-719c-4daf-9815-2f653f8b0ab5@j10g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
References: <30143086.6.1323549838421.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfq24>
 <jc3rrs$27sq$1@news.ett.com.ua> <9kluo1FtlhU1@mid.individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 164.11.203.58
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1323783489 20156 127.0.0.1 (13 Dec 2011 13:38:09
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:38:09 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: j10g2000vbe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=164.11.203.58;
 posting-account=yig7mwoAAAAAcduNbH7Dpal1sjCSAijA
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUARELSCNK
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.2
 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/15.0.874.121 Safari/535.2,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2011-12-13T05:36:15-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 12 Dic, 09:12, Niklas Holsti <niklas.hol...@tidorum.invalid> wrote:
> On 11-12-12 05:19 , a...@att.net wrote:
>
> > -- =A0Interrupts are not necessary. From you description a simple set o=
f
> > -- =A0tasks is all that is needed.
> > --
> > -- =A0This program outline uses three task to read three sockets and
> > -- =A0after pre-processing and verifing data (if needed) passes this
> > -- =A0data to a main task. The main task then can continue processing
> > -- =A0this data.
>
> Just a small comment on a detail in the example:
>
>
>
> > =A0 =A0task body Main is
> ...
> > =A0 =A0begin
> ...
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0accept Acknowledge_1 ( Data : Unsigned_32 ) do
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Task_1_Data :=3D Data ;
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-- process data from task 1
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0end Acknowledge_1 ;
>
> The rendezvous between the Main task and task 1 continues until the "end
> Acknowledge_1". If the Main task processes the data from task 1 before
> the "end Acknowledge_1", as above, task 1 cannot do anything else during
> this processing. The program may be more responsive if the processing is
> done after the rendezvous, in this way:
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0accept Acknowledge_1 ( Data : Unsigned_32 ) do
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Task_1_Data :=3D Data ;
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0end Acknowledge_1 ;
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-- process data from task 1
>
> In this form, the call of Acknowledge_1 from task 1 returns before the
> processing, which means that task 1 can go on to do other things, while
> the Main task is processing the data in Task_1_Data.
>
> --
> Niklas Holsti
> Tidorum Ltd
> niklas holsti tidorum fi
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0. =A0 =A0 =A0@ =A0 =A0 =A0 .

Thank you very much!

You have replied to my question even before I asked!
I don't want that the sockets are blocked at any time, they must be
responsive to the incoming data from C side in every moment!!!
I must not miss any data because, in this case, I would incur in a
safety violation of the system.