From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9eb88bb80477ed08 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: ADA compilers Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.14.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <1117824959.948009.323740@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1117825921.600449.93990@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:21:49 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 03 Jun 2005 21:21:48 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 33450edd.newsread2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=hc>[W<4:CL6g0XoR1BOW]I^><>f3dFY:X>DRfc_PT80 X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11222 Date: 2005-06-03T21:21:48+02:00 List-Id: On 3 Jun 2005 12:12:01 -0700, Patty wrote: > Yes, we are trying to port an existing application. Egh, how to port Ada 83 to Ada 95 without Ada 95? > I have looked at GNAT, but they only have ADA95. 1. There should be no problem to port Ada 83 code to Ada 95. Incompatibilities are rather minor. 2. AFAIK, GNAT has "-gnat83" switch for Ada 83 legacy code. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de